Monday, May 30, 2011

2010 rolls royce interior

2010 rolls royce interior. the Rolls Royce Phantom.
  • the Rolls Royce Phantom.

  • daneoni
    Jan 5, 06:10 AM
    I dont get why people are saying we will get updates to MacBook Pros/iMacs, what will they be updated with?. The Core 2 Duo chips are still the newest chips from intel. Santa Rosa is yet to debut.

    I dont see any updates to them im afraid at MWSF. Maybe we'll see the ultrathin MBP but i highly doubt it...

    2010 rolls royce interior. ROLLS ROYCE CARS FOR SALE: A

  • Mechcozmo
    Jan 10, 09:41 PM
    I told you all !!!! $499 headless Mac - here it comes and marketshare will grow...welcome back Apple !!

    Sigh... Apple is already back.... and we don't need this petition any longer... and the mini mac has been in development for a long time (1 year plus) so the petition didn't do anything with it.

    39 signers in this period of time means it failed, BTW. :rolleyes:

    2010 rolls royce interior. Interior 2010 Mansory
  • Interior 2010 Mansory

  • netdog
    Jan 11, 06:16 PM
    I don't think we are even close in either of these threads. I suspect that 10.5.2 and/or the iPhone SDK are going to contain some huge surprises. Perhaps included in that are some of the Leopard "secret features" that were promised a year ago but took more time than expected.

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 rolls royce interior.
  • 2010 rolls royce interior.

  • queshy
    Jun 24, 04:54 AM
    My prediction: we are many, many years from a fully touch screen interface iMac. It's just not there yet. It works well on a phone but would not work well on a device with a similar form factor as the current iMac.

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 Rolls Royce Phantom
  • 2010 Rolls Royce Phantom

  • Gatesbasher
    Apr 2, 09:14 PM
    It's interesting how the talking points all seem to converge on any given day�today it's "light bleed". But of course, no one's orchestrating them so it's all a big coincidence. Right?

    I think 90% of the issue is that this is the biggest LCD screen people have ever held this close to their face, and some are just now noticing that the LCD pixels can never be perfectly opaque.

    This is a big reason why video purists prefer plasma or DLP TVs�they can deliver a much "blacker black". (But then, "video purist" is becoming just as much of an epithet as "audiophile" when someone is telling us that "nobody can possibly tell the difference" between CD-quality and 128 kps.) It's also why, in printing they have black ink as well as cyan, magenta, and yellow�because they're translucent and can never add up to completely opaque black.

    Obviously the fact that "black" isn't completely black bothers some people more than others, and the fact they noticed that fact for the first time on an Apple product makes it Apple's fault. It bothers me moderately, but I realize it's just a feature of backlit LCDs and get on with my life.

    I'm not one of those people screaming for OLED screens, because I know they won't save any power and I'm unconvinced of their longevity, especially in the humid environment I live in, but they would eliminate that one problem.

    2010 rolls royce interior. Rolls-Royce Phantom Interior
  • Rolls-Royce Phantom Interior

  • shoobe01
    Nov 27, 02:35 PM
    I strongly agree with scottlinux (and almost no one else). I am a graphics professional, and use a 17" Apple LCD with a 17" mitsu CRT to the right as my version of a widescreen. Had it well before there were widescreens, and regardless none of the current crop are wide enough; they all take up too much vertical room. Not just too much to fit my workspace conveniently, but enough my neck gets tired tilting up and down.

    I put all my palettes (and sometimes a referring Word doc or something) to the right. The left monitor is for the work. I have used three monitor systems, where the lefthand one is for source material (like on video work).

    I do something similar at work, with a 1st gen Cinema Display as the main display, and when docked, the powerbook to the right. But I like all the monitors being the same -- fairly small -- height.

    Apple would do great selling a more affordable panel. Aside from space (it would pair well with a thing called a "mini") lots of people will go for the one-stop-shopping experience, as well as the Apple cool and beautiful. Also, they make hella-good displays. I am personally never gonna buy some $129 sale LCD, cause they are crap.

    2010 rolls royce interior. Rolls Royce unveiled a special
  • Rolls Royce unveiled a special

  • Maimon Mons
    Nov 28, 12:02 PM is a link ( to the CNN review of the zune. I wouldn't be surprised if they were payed by Apple given how it ends.

    For what it's worth, the first zune on the list shows up at #21 at the moment. Out of the top 10, 8 are ipods and the other 2 are sandisk models. Zune is beaten out by the 80 GB ipod in addition to the cheaper models.

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2006 Rolls-Royce Phantom Black
  • 2006 Rolls-Royce Phantom Black

  • QuantumLo0p
    Mar 6, 02:23 PM
    Why do Americans harbor hate for diesel? I'm not very familiar with the differences between the fuels, other than gasoline is more refined.

    There are a lot of old perceptions about diesel. I love diesel; they are inherently more efficient than gasoline engines.

    I could say something like- "there are a lot of people in the US stuck on old tech, out dated, dirty, inefficient, gas powered cars that don't last as long as diesels nor have as good as ROI as diesels" but I wouldn't want to upset anyone who owns a technically inferior vehicle so I will keep my thoughts to myself.

    2010 rolls royce interior. 321 rolls royce ghost 2010
  • 321 rolls royce ghost 2010

  • iJawn108
    Aug 7, 03:51 AM
    *hopes for 802.11n airports!*;)

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 Rolls-Royce DROPHEAD | 72
  • 2010 Rolls-Royce DROPHEAD | 72

  • wordoflife
    Feb 27, 08:34 PM
    Changed it up a bit.

    Looks like you do a fair bit of typing on that thing!
    My old one started looking like that but then Apple replaced it with a new one. I bought a keyboard cover. Not because I hate shiny keys, but because hair and stuff was falling in the keys.

    2010 rolls royce interior. Rolls Royce wedding car
  • Rolls Royce wedding car

  • nylonsteel
    Mar 23, 10:17 AM
    1 Terabyte Classic - not

    2010 rolls royce interior. Rolls-Royce Ghost Interior
  • Rolls-Royce Ghost Interior

  • TangoCharlie
    Jul 14, 02:52 AM
    imagine the data you could put onto those disks though!
    ... and what you'd loose when the disk goes bad :mad:

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 rolls royce interior.
  • 2010 rolls royce interior.

  • Sammio2
    Nov 28, 11:39 AM
    Received my brand new MacBook Air 11" today, YAY!

    (1,6 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 128 GB SSD)

    Nice purchase, but I think you're meant to take it out of the box. Not sure though, maybe someone else here could provide some clarification on this...

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom
  • 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom

  • Multimedia
    Jul 14, 07:59 AM
    Well I hope it doesn't come too soon. Blu-ray is just too expensive right now and it would jack up Mac cost significantly. It's also better to see how the Blu-ray vs HD DVD thing works out as well just to make sure Apple doesn't back a dead horse.I agree. I would be surprised if Apple even offers it before next year. Blu-Ray DVRs are still about $1k and the blank media is also very expensive. Apple will have enough challenges keeping the Intel Quad under $4k without including Blu-Ray yet. But by this time next year, I would expect it to be a BTO option for the desktops at least.

    Meanwhile, anyone who wants it can buy an external burner or make one with a FW case. But I don't think even Toast 7 supports Blu-Ray yet. So even HOW we would burn Blu-Ray media is an open question at this point.

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 Rolls-Royce Rr4
  • 2010 Rolls-Royce Rr4

  • No ice please
    Nov 27, 07:19 PM
    Any reason why you didn't go with this case (Aside from the fact that it isn't shipping for another 2.5 weeks)?
    I have a 3G and a 3G[s]. I also tried another variant of the keyboard and love the bigger keys and click of them. Feels really sturdy, good build quality, and it will work for a Ps3 keyboard if I'd ever need one.

    Also a quick edit the other variant keyboard was back lit I don't know if the one you listed is.

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom 6.7
  • 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom 6.7

  • toddybody
    Apr 19, 11:11 AM
    6950 6950 6950 6950 6950 6950 6950 6950 6950!

    For heavens sake give it a nice GPU!!!!!!!!:eek:

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe
  • 2010 Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe

  • Yaboze
    Mar 26, 10:57 PM
    It looks very cool and I'm impressed by the 1080p video. I didn't think there was enough video memory to do that.

    The iPad + HDMI adapter looks a little awkward though. I think a cooler solution would be to have bluetooth controller support, like PS3 controllers or maybe even use the iPhone for the controller via bluetooth.

    Either way, it's impressive. Not quite Xbox 360/PS3 but definitely better than the Wii.

    2010 rolls royce interior. 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost
  • 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost

  • HecubusPro
    Aug 24, 05:57 PM
    man i'd love for them to include "old" yonah based chips and release a mini for $300-$400. i just want the cheapest intel rig i can buy right now as i'm "mid-cycle".

    I thought Yonah and Merom are basically the same cost-wise. That's why everyone thinks including merom in new systems won't raise the price of those systems. I could be wrong.

    2010 rolls royce interior. Rolls+royce+interior+2010
  • Rolls+royce+interior+2010

  • swingerofbirch
    Jul 19, 04:32 PM
    How could the analysts be off by almost a billion dollars? Are they held to account for this?

    Nov 15, 06:10 PM
    This is not true at all. Multi-threading often introduces more problems such as race conditions, deadlocks, pipeline starvations, memory leaks, cache coherency problems. Further more, multithreaded apps are harder and take longer to debug. Also, using threads without good reason too is not efficient (context swtiching) and can cause problems (thread priorities) with other apps running. This is because threads can not yield to other threads and block if such an undesirable condition like a deadlock exists.. Like on Windows when one app has a non responsive thread and the whole system hangs.. Or like when Finder sucks and locks everything..

    Yes, yes, all true... Somewhat. True in the sense of how a lot of programmers approach current threading problems and various development theories. And we're currently limited by our development tools and the operating systems to a certain degree.

    Also, multithreading behaves differently on different platforms with different language environments. Java threading might behave differently than p-threads (C-based) on the same system (OS X).. I am a prfessional developer etc..

    Yes, but so many things behave differently from one platform to another. How is writing a low-level thread management system for each platform different than writing the core functions of a 3D graphics engine that can run cross-platform and take advantage of various differences or feature - OpenGL, Direct3D, 3DNow, etc.. Cross-platform development always has its issues as do using different development tools. You obviously know this as do many programmers, so what's the point of the doom and gloom? It's always been this way and is just a part of the development process.

    Massively multithreaded apps do exist and have been written for various platforms over the years. Here in Windows and OSX land programmers go into panic mode when multithreading is mentioned. Yet SGI had Irix scaled to 256 CPUs and visulization apps utilizing multithreading on individual systems as well as across cluster nodes and displaying images built by multiple graphics pipes using multithreaded OpenGL that could scale from 1 to 16 graphics pipes and any number of CPUs.

    Anyway, my whole point is that the software industry will eventually have to tackle this problem head on and will overcome it. I just don't understand the current resistance and denial exhibited by so many "developers". The hardware is coming, in many situations it's already here... Why fight it? It's time to look at threads in a new light (for many). Upcoming CPU roadmaps place newer quad-core chips in the market in mid '07 with common Xeon and Opteron workstations/servers moving to quad-CPU (16-core) with 45nm process and lower wattage. 8-core CPUs to arrive in '08, 12 and 16 cores per CPU in late '08 or early '09...

    MHz isn't increasing and the consumer still wants the next version of their game or video editor to run twice as fast with more features on the new stystem they just bought, which now has 32 cores instead of 18 cores and they'll switch to a competitor's product if you take more than two or three months to ship your software update... What do you do?

    Apr 5, 01:57 PM
    What are you talking about? iTMS not generating profit? Geez, check your facts!

    You are the one in need of fact checking. Jobs has said in a number of interviews that iTMS will generate enough money to basically break even. iTMS is there to sell iPods, not to make a profit.


    Mar 30, 03:06 PM
    If tonyfailx86 is now a source for rumors, we have to get another "job"...

    THe KiNG.

    Apr 12, 09:47 PM just being black and green means 'consumer' now? :confused:

    No, but having features like face detection does suggest that it's a 'consumer' orientated product.

    Personally, I don't mind. As long as all the old multitrack features are still available (and the price significantly drops, to say, $50-$300,) then I intend to buy it.

    Sep 6, 08:40 AM (

    Apple has updated the Mac Mini to include all Core Duo models. Other than the processor upgrade, there does not appear to be any differences between the previous Mac Mini and today's release. The Mac Mini is available in two offerings:

    1.66 GHz Mac Mini
    60 GB 5400-rpm SATA Hard Drive
    Combo Drive

    1.83 GHz Mac Mini
    80 GB 5400-rpm SATA Hard Drive

    Both models feature:
    -2MB Shared L2 Cache
    -512 MB 667 MHz DDR2 RAM standard (up to 2 GB supported)
    -GMA 950 Integrated graphics
    -1 Firewire 400, 4 USB 2.0
    -Optical Digital/Analog Audio In/Out
    -Gigabit ethernet
    -Airport Extreme and Bluetooth 2.0+EDR standard

    Of note, the Mac Mini still uses Core Duo (Yonah), not the more advanced Core 2 Duo "Merom" chip found in today's iMac announcements (

    No comments:

    Post a Comment